Comment ça marche
De la page blanche à un article avec des sources en trois étapes
Importez vos sources
Glissez des PDF, importez depuis Zotero ou Mendeley, ou laissez Jenni parcourir plus de 200 millions d’articles. Votre bibliothèque est prête en quelques secondes.
Écrivez avec l’IA
La saisie semi-automatique intelligente de l’IA propose des phrases fondées sur de véritables articles scientifiques. Chaque suggestion est citée et peut être retracée jusqu’à sa source.
Citer, relire, exporter
Citations intégrées en un clic dans plus de 2 600 styles. Vérifiez chaque affirmation à partir du PDF d’origine. Exportez en .docx, LaTeX ou HTML.
Six ways your citations can fail — and how Jenni catches them
Claim Confidence verifies every cited claim against its source and sorts issues into six categories — so you know exactly what kind of fix is needed.
Misrepresented
The claim distorts what the cited source actually says.
EXAMPLE
"Smith (2022) demonstrated that GPT-4 outperforms human teachers" — when Smith only measured grading speed, not teaching quality.
Contradicted
The cited source argues the opposite of the claim.
EXAMPLE
"Continuous fasting accelerates cellular repair (Lin et al., 2023)" — but Lin's findings show repair plateaus after 72 hours.
Unsupported
The cited source doesn't address the claim at all.
EXAMPLE
"CRISPR-Cas9 has been ethically endorsed by the WHO (Doudna, 2020)" — Doudna discusses mechanism, not WHO policy.
Weakly supported
Evidence in the source is thin or limited in scope.
EXAMPLE
"Resistance training improves cognition across populations (Conan, 2020)" — Conan studied only collegiate athletes.
Overstated
The claim goes further than the source warrants.
EXAMPLE
"LLM tutors significantly improve student outcomes (Park, 2024)" — Park reports a small effect on one task.
Unverifiable
The cited source can't be located or accessed.
EXAMPLE
"(Nakamura et al., 2019)" — DOI doesn't resolve, and no record exists in any indexed database.
See Claim Confidence in action
Watch Jenni's AI citation checker verify a real draft, flag weak and unsupported claims, and surface the source passages — in just over a minute.
Pas juste un autre chatbot IA
Il existe des centaines d’outils d’IA. Voici ce qui distingue Jenni de ChatGPT.
Reads the full source
Other AI citation checkers verify metadata — does the paper exist, is the DOI valid, is the author real. Claim Confidence reads the full text of every cited source, so verdicts come from what the paper actually says.
Six verdicts, not pass/fail
A binary "verified" stamp doesn't tell you how to fix a problem. Six categories pinpoint exactly what kind of edit each claim needs.
Suggested rewrites grounded in the source
When a claim falls short, Claim Confidence surfaces the actual passage from the cited source and proposes a rewrite that fits what the source supports.
Repérez les faiblesses avant les évaluateurs
Reviews analyse chaque affirmation de votre article, recoupe vos sources et signale les problèmes dans six catégories. Soumettez votre travail en toute confiance, sans stress.
Les affirmations non vérifiées ou spéculatives sont la cause la plus fréquente de rejet lors de l’évaluation par les pairs. Jenni les repère en quelques secondes.
Peer review8 / 10
Manuscript scored against a peer-review rubric with reviewer comments on each section.
Soundness
3/4
Presentation
4/4
Contribution
3/4
Results
Strengths
Weaknesses
Claim confidence7 issues
Every cited claim verified against its source — sorted into seven verdicts so you know exactly what kind of fix each one needs.
Supported
23Misrepresented
Contradicted
1Unsupported
3Weakly supported
2Overstated
Unverifiable
1Proofread18 edits
Whilst generally sound, the text contains some areas for improvement to comply with academic best practices.
Word choice
AllThe majority of participants reported improved outcomes.
Formality
Yang (2024) found a negative correlation which was interesting..
Grammar
These results indicate that early intervention be effective. appears to be effective.
Transitions
Also, In addition, Jones (2022) found similar results.
Overgeneralized
AllThe majority of participants reported improved outcomes.
The results provesuggest that X has an effect on Y.Tone of voice22 notes
Suggestions across vocabulary, syntax, punctuation, tone and flow to keep a consistent academic voice.
All Suggestions
22Vocabulary
6Syntax
5Punctuation
4Tone
3Flow
4Analyse des citations
Correction académique
Commentaires intégrés
Commentaires intégrés
Questions fréquemment posées
Nos utilisateurs ont publié des articles dans plus de 100 revues
De véritables recherches, publiées dans des revues comme IEEE, Springer et Elsevier — pensées et rédigées avec Jenni.
