AI Research Workspace built for Academics

Import papers, ask questions across your library, and verify every claim before you submit.

HC

HC

HC

Loved by over 6 million academics

AI Research Workspace built for Academics

Import papers, ask questions across your library, and verify every claim before you submit.

HC

HC

HC

Loved by over 6 million academics

AI Research Workspace built for Academics

Import papers, ask questions across your library, and verify every claim before you submit.

HC

HC

HC

Loved by over 6 million academics

Library
Search 5,032 sources…
Sources
Collections
Filters
Article
IF15.00
OPEN ACCESS
Maximal deadlift strength and its correlation with sprint velocity
Schiemann, Warneke, Conan
J. Strength & Conditioning · 2024
Deadlift Library
Cite Details Open PDF
Article
IF15.00
OPEN ACCESS
Post-activation performance enhancement in elite athletes
Abade, Sánchez, Pareja-Blanco
Sports Medicine · 2023
Performance
Cite Details Open PDF
Article
IF3.70
OPEN ACCESS
Strength training modalities for sprint performance
Warneke, Lohmann, Keiner
Sports · 2022
Performance
Cite Details Open PDF
Article
IF15.00
OPEN ACCESS
Lower-body strength transfer to sprint: a meta-analysis
Seitz, Reyes, Tran, Haff
Sports Medicine · 2014
Sprint Mechanics
Cite Details Open PDF
Article
IF4.20
OPEN ACCESS
Rate of force development in elite sprinters
Morin, Gimenez, Edouard
Frontiers in Physiology · 2019
Biomechanics
Cite Details Open PDF
Article
IF15.00
OPEN ACCESS
Post-activation potentiation: physiological mechanisms
Blazevich, Babault
Sports Medicine · 2019
PAPE notes
Cite Details Open PDF
Article
IF3.80
OPEN ACCESS
Plyometric training effects on vertical jump performance
Markovic, Jaric
J. Applied Physiology · 2007
Deadlift Library
Cite Details Open PDF
Maximum Deadlift Capacity of Elite Sprinters R…
Text
BIU
Cite
Autocomplete

Abstract

This investigation quantifies elite sprinters' maximal deadlift capacity, showing that elite cohorts lift up to three times their body weight and underscoring the role of lower-body strength in sprint performance (Schiemann et al., 2024). This association holds across athletic populations, substantiating its contribution to explosive power (Conan & DeBeliso, 2020). Maximal lower-extremity strength also enhances jumping and sprint performance in team sports (Warneke et al., 2022).

References

Abade, E., Sánchez-Sánchez, J., Conte, D., & Pareja-Blanco, F. (2023). Effects of adding heavy loaded deadlifts to warm-up on acute vertical jump and change-of-direction performance. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 37(5), 1052–1059. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000004341
Conan, E., & DeBeliso, M. (2020). The relationship between the back squat and sprint performance in track athletes. Journal of Sport and Human Performance, 8(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.12691/jshp-8-1-1
Schiemann, S., Keiner, M., Wirth, K., Lohmann, L. H., & Warneke, K. (2024). The relationship between maximum deadlift strength and sprint performance in elite athletes. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 38(4), 721–733. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000004712
Seitz, L. B., Reyes, A., Tran, T. T., de Villarreal, E. S., & Haff, G. G. (2014). Increases in lower-body strength transfer positively to sprint performance: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Sports Medicine, 44(12), 1693–1702. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-014-0227-1
Warneke, K., Lohmann, L. H., Keiner, M., & Wagner, C.-M. (2022). Influence of strength training modalities on sprint performance in trained athletes. Sports, 10(7), 107. https://doi.org/10.3390/sports10070107
2,051 words
AI Chat
Add context
Current document
Ask AI, use @ to mention specific PDFs or / to access saved prompts

Trusted by Universities and businesses across the world

Trusted by Universities and businesses across the world

Trusted by Universities and businesses across the world

How it works

How it works

From sources to submission, end to end

01
Import your sources
Upload PDFs directly or connect your Zotero or Mendeley library. Your papers live in Jenni's library alongside your document.
02
Ask your library
Ask questions across all your sources at once. Jenni answers with citations — so you always know which paper said what.
03
Draft from evidence
As you write, Jenni suggests sentences grounded in your papers, not the open web. Every suggestion has a source attached.
04
Trace the claim
Click any citation in your document to jump to the exact sentence in the source PDF that supports it. Every claim is auditable.
05
Review before submission
Run Jenni's Claim Confidence review. It flags unsupported, overstated, or contradicted claims in your draft so you catch problems before reviewers do.
Step 01Import your sources
Library
+ Add PDF
Zotero ↗
On-site sanitation systems and fecal coliforms…
Water Research, 2025
Increased Plasma Levels of ACE2…
Int'l Journal of Molecular Sciences
Urban groundwater contamination in…
Environmental Science, 2024
Systematic review of citation practices in AI…
PLOS ONE, 2024
AI-assisted methodology in clinical research
Nature Reviews, 2023

built for research writing

built for research writing

Defensible by design

Research writing isn't just drafting, it's defending. Jenni helps you build arguments that hold up against the most skeptical reader.

Defensible arguments

Surface counter-arguments, tighten weak claims, and stress-test your reasoning. An AI that strengthens your draft, not just polishes it.

Long-form coherence

Keep voice, terminology, and citation style consistent across every chapter and every revision. From outline to final manuscript.

Native academic English

Match formal academic, concise scientific, or technical tones across 30+ languages. Especially helpful for multilingual researchers.

PRE-SUBMISSION REVIEW

Catch issues before reviewers do

Four review layers that catch issues before reviewers do: Peer Review, Claim Confidence, Proofread, and Tone of Voice. Run them together for a defensible draft.

Peer review8 / 10

Manuscript scored against a peer-review rubric with reviewer comments on each section.

Soundness
3/4
Presentation
4/4
Contribution
3/4
Results
Strengths
Weaknesses
Claim confidence7 issues

Every cited claim verified against its source — sorted into seven verdicts so you know exactly what kind of fix each one needs.

Supported
23
Misrepresented
Contradicted
1
Unsupported
3
Weakly supported
2
Overstated
Unverifiable
1
Proofread18 edits

Whilst generally sound, the text contains some areas for improvement to comply with academic best practices.

Word choice
AllThe majority of participants reported improved outcomes.
Formality
Yang (2024) found a negative correlation which was interesting..
Grammar
These results indicate that early intervention be effective. appears to be effective.
Transitions
Also, In addition, Jones (2022) found similar results.
Overgeneralized
AllThe majority of participants reported improved outcomes.
The results provesuggest that X has an effect on Y.
Tone of voice22 notes

Suggestions across vocabulary, syntax, punctuation, tone and flow to keep a consistent academic voice.

All Suggestions
22
Vocabulary
6
Syntax
5
Punctuation
4
Tone
3
Flow
4

Peer Review

Claim Confidence

Proofread

Tone of Voice

"The Claim Confidence feature is super useful. It flags any unsupported, overstated, or weakly supported claims."

Sabine Hossenfelder

Physicist & Author of Lost in Math

"The Claim Confidence feature is super useful. It flags any unsupported, overstated, or weakly supported claims."

Sabine Hossenfelder

Physicist & Author of Lost in Math

"The Claim Confidence feature is super useful. It flags any unsupported, overstated, or weakly supported claims."

Sabine Hossenfelder

Physicist & Author of Lost in Math

"I regularly try AI tools for research and have found Jenni the best and easiest to use. Especially for rapdily re-formatting references and developing new paper ideas."

Gareth

Editor-in-chief, Taylor & Francis

"I regularly try AI tools for research and have found Jenni the best and easiest to use. Especially for rapdily re-formatting references and developing new paper ideas."

Gareth

Editor-in-chief, Taylor & Francis

"I regularly try AI tools for research and have found Jenni the best and easiest to use. Especially for rapdily re-formatting references and developing new paper ideas."

Gareth

Editor-in-chief, Taylor & Francis

Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Is AI safe to use for academic research?

What's the best AI tool for source-grounded academic writing?

Can I use AI to write my thesis or dissertation without losing my own voice?

How accurate are AI-generated citations and how do I verify they're real?

How do researchers use AI without compromising academic integrity?

How is Jenni different from ChatGPT, Claude, or Gemini for research papers?

How can non-native English researchers use AI to publish in international journals?

Can AI help me synthesize a systematic literature review from my reference library?

How do I cite AI assistance in a peer-reviewed manuscript or thesis?

What citation styles and export formats does Jenni support for LaTeX, Word, and Overleaf?

Make progress on your greatest work, today

Write your first paper with Jenni today and never look back

Start for free

No credit card required

Cancel anytime

Over 6m

Academics worldwide

5.2 hours saved

On average per paper

Over 15m

Papers written on Jenni

Make progress on your greatest work, today

Write your first paper with Jenni today and never look back

Start for free

No credit card required

Cancel anytime

Over 6m

Academics worldwide

5.2 hours saved

On average per paper

Over 15m

Papers written on Jenni

Make progress on your greatest work, today

Write your first paper with Jenni today and never look back

Start for free

No credit card required

Cancel anytime

Over 6m

Academics worldwide

5.2 hours saved

On average per paper

Over 15m

Papers written on Jenni