Come funziona
Dalla pagina bianca all’articolo citato in tre passaggi
Importa le tue fonti
Trascina i PDF, importa da Zotero o Mendeley, oppure lascia che Jenni cerchi oltre 200 milioni di articoli. La tua libreria è pronta in pochi secondi.
Scrivi insieme all’IA
Il completamento automatico intelligente basato sull’IA suggerisce frasi fondate su articoli scientifici reali. I suggerimenti sono corredati di citazioni e possono essere ricondotti alla fonte.
Cita, esamina, esporta
Citazioni in linea con un clic in oltre 2.600 stili. Verifica ogni affermazione confrontandola con il PDF originale. Esporta in .docx, LaTeX o HTML.
Six ways your citations can fail — and how Jenni catches them
Claim Confidence verifies every cited claim against its source and sorts issues into six categories — so you know exactly what kind of fix is needed.
Misrepresented
The claim distorts what the cited source actually says.
EXAMPLE
"Smith (2022) demonstrated that GPT-4 outperforms human teachers" — when Smith only measured grading speed, not teaching quality.
Contradicted
The cited source argues the opposite of the claim.
EXAMPLE
"Continuous fasting accelerates cellular repair (Lin et al., 2023)" — but Lin's findings show repair plateaus after 72 hours.
Unsupported
The cited source doesn't address the claim at all.
EXAMPLE
"CRISPR-Cas9 has been ethically endorsed by the WHO (Doudna, 2020)" — Doudna discusses mechanism, not WHO policy.
Weakly supported
Evidence in the source is thin or limited in scope.
EXAMPLE
"Resistance training improves cognition across populations (Conan, 2020)" — Conan studied only collegiate athletes.
Overstated
The claim goes further than the source warrants.
EXAMPLE
"LLM tutors significantly improve student outcomes (Park, 2024)" — Park reports a small effect on one task.
Unverifiable
The cited source can't be located or accessed.
EXAMPLE
"(Nakamura et al., 2019)" — DOI doesn't resolve, and no record exists in any indexed database.
See Claim Confidence in action
Watch Jenni's AI citation checker verify a real draft, flag weak and unsupported claims, and surface the source passages — in just over a minute.
Non l’ennesimo chatbot di intelligenza artificiale
Esistono centinaia di strumenti di intelligenza artificiale. Ecco cosa rende Jenni diversa da ChatGPT.
Reads the full source
Other AI citation checkers verify metadata — does the paper exist, is the DOI valid, is the author real. Claim Confidence reads the full text of every cited source, so verdicts come from what the paper actually says.
Six verdicts, not pass/fail
A binary "verified" stamp doesn't tell you how to fix a problem. Six categories pinpoint exactly what kind of edit each claim needs.
Suggested rewrites grounded in the source
When a claim falls short, Claim Confidence surfaces the actual passage from the cited source and proposes a rewrite that fits what the source supports.
Individua i punti deboli prima dei revisori
Reviews analizza ogni affermazione nel tuo elaborato, incrocia le tue fonti e segnala i problemi in sei categorie. Invia con fiducia, non con ansia.
Le affermazioni non verificate o speculative sono la causa più comune di rifiuto nella revisione tra pari. Jenni le individua in pochi secondi.
Peer review8 / 10
Manuscript scored against a peer-review rubric with reviewer comments on each section.
Soundness
3/4
Presentation
4/4
Contribution
3/4
Results
Strengths
Weaknesses
Claim confidence7 issues
Every cited claim verified against its source — sorted into seven verdicts so you know exactly what kind of fix each one needs.
Supported
23Misrepresented
Contradicted
1Unsupported
3Weakly supported
2Overstated
Unverifiable
1Proofread18 edits
Whilst generally sound, the text contains some areas for improvement to comply with academic best practices.
Word choice
AllThe majority of participants reported improved outcomes.
Formality
Yang (2024) found a negative correlation which was interesting..
Grammar
These results indicate that early intervention be effective. appears to be effective.
Transitions
Also, In addition, Jones (2022) found similar results.
Overgeneralized
AllThe majority of participants reported improved outcomes.
The results provesuggest that X has an effect on Y.Tone of voice22 notes
Suggestions across vocabulary, syntax, punctuation, tone and flow to keep a consistent academic voice.
All Suggestions
22Vocabulary
6Syntax
5Punctuation
4Tone
3Flow
4Analisi delle citazioni
Correzione di bozze accademica
Feedback in linea
Feedback in linea
Domande frequenti
I nostri utenti hanno pubblicato articoli in oltre 100 riviste scientifiche
Ricerche autentiche, pubblicate in riviste come IEEE, Springer ed Elsevier — pianificate e redatte con Jenni.
