从资助方指南到润色好的申请书，尽在一个工作区
强大功能
无需切换工具，即可完成研究、起草与修改
AI 对话使用您自己的材料进行工作在当前文档、选定的 PDF、学术收藏库或整个网络中进行提问。
AI 自动补全保持撰写流畅，初稿不停歇系统会结合文档上下文、标题、章节提示词（Section Prompts）以及所引用的文献源来生成写作建议。
AI 编辑审查每一项修改建议在接受修改之前，您可以进行改写、简化、润色、翻译，或应用自定义指令，并查看明显的差异对比。
在草稿旁保留大纲
Jenni 在撰写计划书的文档内为项目申请书撰写者提供来源背景、章节级指导和编辑控制。
来源上下文在撰写过程中，将资助机构指南、数据和报告保留在侧边栏中，使项目简报始终一目了然，无需在其他标签页中繁琐查找。
章节级指南针对每个提案部分（需求陈述、项目叙述、评估）量身定制的指导，确保每一部分都能切实回答资助方的具体要求。
编辑控制AI 的每一个建议都由您来决定接受、修改或拒绝。您将完全掌握文章的基调和论点，并始终保持作者身份。
提交前审查
在提交您的计划书之前，请对其进行润色
在您提交之前，通过四个评审层级捕获资助方可能会标记的问题：资助申请评审、事实可信度、校对以及语气语调。
Grant review8 / 10
Your proposal scored against a funder review rubric, with reviewer comments on each section.
Significance
3/4
Approach
4/4
Feasibility
3/4
Impact
Strengths
Weaknesses
Claim confidence10 issues
Claim Confidence checks every claim against your uploaded sources, flagging what a funder or reviewer would question before you submit.
Misrepresented
Contradicted
1Unsupported
4Weakly supported
2Overstated
2Off-brief
1Vague impact
1Unverifiable
Outdated
Citation mismatch
1Proofread18 edits
Whilst generally sound, the proposal has areas to tighten before it reaches a reviewer.
Word choice
AllMost communities were affected.
Formality
The 2025 assessment found a large gap which was pretty bad..
Grammar
These findings indicate the program be effective. is likely to be effective.
Transitions
Also, In addition, the county report found similar gaps.
Overstated
AllMany residents lack preventive care.
The program will eliminatereduce barriers to care.Tone of voice22 notes
Suggestions across vocabulary, syntax, punctuation, tone and flow to keep a consistent, funder-ready voice.
All Suggestions
22Vocabulary
6Syntax
5Punctuation
4Tone
3Flow
4基金评审
置信声明
校对
语气
