하는 방법
빈 페이지에서 인용된 논문까지, 3단계로
소스를 가져오기
PDF를 드래그해 넣고, Zotero 또는 Mendeley에서 가져오거나, Jenni가 2억 편 이상의 논문을 검색하게 하세요. 라이브러리는 몇 초 만에 준비됩니다.
AI와 함께 글쓰기
스마트 AI 자동완성은 실제 논문에 근거한 문장을 제안합니다. 제안에는 출처가 표시되며 원문까지 추적할 수 있습니다.
인용, 검토, 내보내기
2,600개 이상의 스타일에서 원클릭 인라인 인용. 모든 주장을 원본 PDF와 대조해 확인하세요. .docx, LaTeX 또는 HTML로 내보내기.
Six ways your citations can fail — and how Jenni catches them
Claim Confidence verifies every cited claim against its source and sorts issues into six categories — so you know exactly what kind of fix is needed.
Misrepresented
The claim distorts what the cited source actually says.
EXAMPLE
"Smith (2022) demonstrated that GPT-4 outperforms human teachers" — when Smith only measured grading speed, not teaching quality.
Contradicted
The cited source argues the opposite of the claim.
EXAMPLE
"Continuous fasting accelerates cellular repair (Lin et al., 2023)" — but Lin's findings show repair plateaus after 72 hours.
Unsupported
The cited source doesn't address the claim at all.
EXAMPLE
"CRISPR-Cas9 has been ethically endorsed by the WHO (Doudna, 2020)" — Doudna discusses mechanism, not WHO policy.
Weakly supported
Evidence in the source is thin or limited in scope.
EXAMPLE
"Resistance training improves cognition across populations (Conan, 2020)" — Conan studied only collegiate athletes.
Overstated
The claim goes further than the source warrants.
EXAMPLE
"LLM tutors significantly improve student outcomes (Park, 2024)" — Park reports a small effect on one task.
Unverifiable
The cited source can't be located or accessed.
EXAMPLE
"(Nakamura et al., 2019)" — DOI doesn't resolve, and no record exists in any indexed database.
See Claim Confidence in action
Watch Jenni's AI citation checker verify a real draft, flag weak and unsupported claims, and surface the source passages — in just over a minute.
또 다른 AI 챗봇이 아니야
수백 가지 AI 도구가 있습니다. Jenni가 ChatGPT와 다른 점은 다음과 같습니다.
Reads the full source
Other AI citation checkers verify metadata — does the paper exist, is the DOI valid, is the author real. Claim Confidence reads the full text of every cited source, so verdicts come from what the paper actually says.
Six verdicts, not pass/fail
A binary "verified" stamp doesn't tell you how to fix a problem. Six categories pinpoint exactly what kind of edit each claim needs.
Suggested rewrites grounded in the source
When a claim falls short, Claim Confidence surfaces the actual passage from the cited source and proposes a rewrite that fits what the source supports.
검토자가 알아채기 전에 약점을 발견하세요
Reviews는 여러분의 논문에 있는 모든 주장을 분석하고, 출처를 교차 참조하며, 6개 범주의 문제를 표시합니다. 불안이 아니라 자신감을 가지고 제출하세요.
검증되지 않았거나 추측에 불과한 주장은 동료 심사 거절의 가장 흔한 원인입니다. Jenni는 몇 초 만에 이를 찾아냅니다.
Peer review8 / 10
Manuscript scored against a peer-review rubric with reviewer comments on each section.
Soundness
3/4
Presentation
4/4
Contribution
3/4
Results
Strengths
Weaknesses
Claim confidence7 issues
Every cited claim verified against its source — sorted into seven verdicts so you know exactly what kind of fix each one needs.
Supported
23Misrepresented
Contradicted
1Unsupported
3Weakly supported
2Overstated
Unverifiable
1Proofread18 edits
Whilst generally sound, the text contains some areas for improvement to comply with academic best practices.
Word choice
AllThe majority of participants reported improved outcomes.
Formality
Yang (2024) found a negative correlation which was interesting..
Grammar
These results indicate that early intervention be effective. appears to be effective.
Transitions
Also, In addition, Jones (2022) found similar results.
Overgeneralized
AllThe majority of participants reported improved outcomes.
The results provesuggest that X has an effect on Y.Tone of voice22 notes
Suggestions across vocabulary, syntax, punctuation, tone and flow to keep a consistent academic voice.
All Suggestions
22Vocabulary
6Syntax
5Punctuation
4Tone
3Flow
4인용 분석
학술 교정
인라인 피드백
인라인 피드백
자주 묻는 질문
저희 사용자는 100개 이상의 저널에 논문을 게재했습니다
IEEE, Springer, Elsevier 같은 학술지에 게재된 실제 연구 — Jenni로 기획하고 작성하세요.
