MLA vs Chicago Citation Style: Key Differences and Examples
Choosing the right citation style can feel confusing, especially when both MLA and Chicago are widely used in academic writing. MLA is common in the humanities, focusing on authorship and page numbers, while Chicago is often used in history and social sciences, known for its flexibility with notes and bibliographies.
Understanding when and how to use each style helps you avoid citation mistakes and build academic credibility. In this guide, you’ll see the main differences, formatting rules, and practical examples to make citing sources easier and more accurate.
<CTA title="Compare Citation Styles with Ease" description="MLA or Chicago, finding the right citation style does not need to be confusing. Jenni helps you format citations and bibliographies so your writing stays accurate and credible." buttonLabel="Try Jenni Free" link="https://app.jenni.ai/register" />
When to Use MLA vs Chicago Style
Different styles serve different disciplines. MLA is typically used in the humanities, while Chicago offers more flexibility in history, arts, and some social sciences. Here’s how each fits.
MLA in the Humanities
Best for literature, languages, and cultural studies
Prioritizes author name + page number in citations
Works well for close readings of novels, plays, and poems
Chicago in History and Arts
Chicago is valued for its thoroughness and flexibility.
Notes-Bibliography system supports detailed footnotes
Perfect for archival research, fine arts, and historical writing
Social Sciences and Beyond
In fields like anthropology or political science, Chicago’s Author-Date system is often preferred. This approach resembles APA and highlights timeliness in sources.
<ProTip title="📘 Quick Tip:" description="Citation requirements often depend on your professor or journal. Always double-check before starting your paper." />
Main Differences Between Chicago and MLA
Both MLA and Chicago aim to credit sources, but they differ in how citations, notes, and reference pages are handled. These distinctions can shape the flow of your paper, so it’s important to know when and how to use each.
In-Text Citation Format
MLA: Uses author–page style → (Smith 45)
Chicago Author-Date: Author + year → (Smith 2020, 45)
Chicago Notes-Bibliography: Source info in footnotes or endnotes
👉 MLA keeps citations short within the text, while Chicago offers more flexibility. Choose MLA for concise papers and Chicago for projects with heavy sourcing.
Footnotes and Endnotes Usage
Chicago’s Notes-Bibliography system:
Allows detailed commentary alongside references
Ideal for history and archival research
MLA:
Rarely uses footnotes (only clarifications)
Keeps text streamlined but sacrifices depth
<ProTip title="🔎 Research Detail:" description="Chicago footnotes allow you to add deeper commentary and context, while MLA prioritizes streamlined text flow." />
Bibliography vs Works Cited
MLA: “Works Cited” → only sources quoted or paraphrased in the paper
Chicago: “Bibliography” → all sources consulted, even if not directly cited
This difference impacts research habits. MLA narrows your list, while Chicago encourages documenting the broader scope of your reading.
Title Page and Formatting
MLA: Typically no separate title page unless required
Chicago: Prefers a structured title page for most papers
Formatting choices (fonts, margins, spacing) can also differ slightly. Double-check guidelines since presentation details affect credibility.
<ProTip title="📝 Formatting Reminder:" description="MLA keeps citations short and within the text, while Chicago allows more flexibility with footnotes and endnotes." />
MLA vs Chicago Formatting Guidelines
While both MLA and Chicago cover similar basics like margins and fonts, they differ in how they handle page setup and reference organization. Here are the key points to know.
General layout
Both styles usually follow 1-inch margins, double spacing, and 12-pt Times New Roman. However, Chicago can be more flexible depending on the professor or publisher.
Title page requirements
Style | Title Page |
MLA | Usually no title page; the first page lists student info and the centered title. |
Chicago | Commonly requires a full title page with course, date, and professor’s name. |
Headings and organization
MLA → Limited use of headings; essays often flow without sublevels.
Chicago → Encourages structured use of headings and subheadings, especially for longer works.
<ProTip title="⚖️ Layout Tip:" description="MLA rarely uses a title page, while Chicago often requires one with full details such as course, date, and professor." />
Citation Examples for Chicago and MLA
Here are straightforward examples to show how MLA and Chicago styles differ. These samples cover both in-text citations and bibliography entries so you can see each format in action.
MLA In-Text Citation Example
In-text citation (book):
(Smith 45)
Works Cited entry:
Smith, John. The Future of Education. Oxford University Press, 2020.
Chicago Footnote and Bibliography Example
Footnote (book):
John Smith, The Future of Education (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020), 45.
Bibliography entry:
Smith, John. The Future of Education. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020.
Which Style Should You Choose?
When deciding between MLA and Chicago, think about your discipline and the level of detail your paper requires. MLA is often the go-to for humanities and language studies, while Chicago is preferred in history, arts, and research-heavy subjects.
MLA works best for essays that value simplicity and readability.
Chicago is ideal for projects needing thorough source details and flexibility.
Stronger Writing with the Right Citation Style
MLA and Chicago both ensure clarity and credibility. Pick the style that fits your field and stay consistent.
<CTA title="Simplify Your Citations with Jenni" description="Save time and ensure accuracy with MLA and Chicago citations created in seconds" buttonLabel="Try Jenni Free" link="https://app.jenni.ai/register" />
Mastering citations lets you focus more on your ideas and less on formatting.