Yeh kaise kaam karta hai
Draft se verified citations tak teen steps mein
Apna draft yahan daalen
Ek section paste karein, apni .docx upload karein, ya seedha Jenni ke editor mein kaam karein. Claim Confidence har in-text citation ko padhkar us source ko dhoondta hai jiski taraf woh ishara karta hai.
Review chalao
Jenni har citation ko uske source ke saath cross-reference karti hai — aapki library ke saath-saath CrossRef, PubMed, aur OpenAlex ke against daawon ko verify karti hai. Ek minute se kam mein faisla.
Edit aur dobara verify karein
Har flag ki gayi daawa aapko source se exact passage aur ek sujhaaya gaya rewrite dikhati hai. Use accept, edit, ya dismiss karein, phir review ko dobara run karke fix ko confirm karein.
Aapki citations fail hone ke 6 tareeqe — aur Jenni unhe kaise pakad leti hai
Claim Confidence har cited claim ko uske source ke against verify karta hai aur issues ko chhe categories mein sort karta hai — taaki aapko bilkul pata ho ki kis tarah ka fix chahiye.
Galat tareeke se pesh kiya gaya
Yeh daava cited source jo asal mein kehta hai, usse distort karta hai.
Udaaharan
"Smith (2022) ne dikhaya ki GPT-4 human teachers se behtar perform karta hai" — jab Smith ne sirf grading speed maapi, teaching quality nahi.
Virodh kiya
Uddhrit srot daave ke vipreet tark deta hai.
Udaaharan
"Lagataar upvaas cellular repair ko tez karta hai (Lin et al., 2023)" — lekin Lin ke nishkarsh dikhate hain ki 72 ghanton ke baad repair ek sthar par aa jati hai.
Support nahi hai
Jis source ka hawala diya gaya hai, woh daave ko bilkul bhi address nahin karta.
Udaaharan
"CRISPR-Cas9 ko WHO (Doudna, 2020) dwara naitik roop se samarthit kiya gaya hai" — Doudna mechanism par charcha karti hain, WHO ki policy par nahin.
Kamzor roop se samarthit
Source mein saboot bahut kam hain ya scope seemit hai.
Udaaharan
"Resistance training se cognition alag-alag populations mein behtar hoti hai (Conan, 2020)" — Conan ne sirf college ke khiladiyon ka adhyayan kiya tha.
Badhachadhakar dikhaya gaya
Yeh daava source ke samarthan se aage nikal jaata hai.
Udaaharan
"LLM tutors chhatron ke nateejon ko kaafi behtar banate hain (Park, 2024)" — Park ek task par halka sa asar report karte hain.
Aswachha
Ullekhit source ko locate ya access nahi kiya ja sakta.
Udaaharan
"(Nakamura et al., 2019)" — DOI resolve nahi ho raha hai, aur kisi indexed database mein koi record maujood nahi hai.
Claim Confidence ko action mein dekhein
Jenni ke AI citation checker ko ek real draft verify karte, kamzor aur asamarthit daavon ko flag karte, aur source passages ko saamne laate dekhiye — bas ek minute se thoda zyada samay mein.
Sirf metadata ke liye nahi, balki asal mahatva ke liye banaaya gaya
Dusre AI citation tools ya to references bana dete hain ya bas unka format theek karte hain. Claim Confidence har daave ko us source ke against verify karta hai jise woh cite karta hai.
Poora source padhta hai
Dusre AI citation checkers metadata verify karte hain — kya paper maujood hai, kya DOI valid hai, kya author real hai. Claim Confidence har cited source ka full text padhta hai, isliye verdicts us par aate hain jo paper asal mein kehta hai.
Chhe faisle, pass/fail nahi
Ek binary "verified" stamp yeh nahi batata ki kisi problem ko kaise fix karein. Chhah categories bilkul sahi batati hain ki har daave ko kis tarah ki editing ki zaroorat hai.
Source par adharit sujhaav ki gayi punarlikhan
Jab koi daava kam padta hai, Claim Confidence cited source se asli passage dikhaata hai aur ek aisi rewrite sujhaata hai jo source ke support ke mutabik ho.
Aapki poori pre-submission citation review
Peer Review un chaar Review tools mein se ek hai jo reviewers se pehle issues pakad lete hain. Submit karne se pehle complete check ke liye inhe saath mein chalao.
Peer review8 / 10
Manuscript scored against a peer-review rubric with reviewer comments on each section.
Soundness
3/4
Presentation
4/4
Contribution
3/4
Results
Strengths
Weaknesses
Claim confidence7 issues
Every cited claim verified against its source — sorted into seven verdicts so you know exactly what kind of fix each one needs.
Supported
23Misrepresented
Contradicted
1Unsupported
3Weakly supported
2Overstated
Unverifiable
1Proofread18 edits
Whilst generally sound, the text contains some areas for improvement to comply with academic best practices.
Word choice
AllThe majority of participants reported improved outcomes.
Formality
Yang (2024) found a negative correlation which was interesting..
Grammar
These results indicate that early intervention be effective. appears to be effective.
Transitions
Also, In addition, Jones (2022) found similar results.
Overgeneralized
AllThe majority of participants reported improved outcomes.
The results provesuggest that X has an effect on Y.Tone of voice22 notes
Suggestions across vocabulary, syntax, punctuation, tone and flow to keep a consistent academic voice.
All Suggestions
22Vocabulary
6Syntax
5Punctuation
4Tone
3Flow
4Sahakarmi Samiksha
Daave vishwas
Proofread
Awaaz ka lehja
Aksar pooche jaane waale prashn
Hamare users ne 100+ journals mein papers publish kiye hain
Asli research, jo IEEE, Springer, Elsevier jaise journals mein published hui—Jenni mein plan aur likhi gayi.
