Purpose ke saath Sudhar karna: Aapke Paper ko Sudharne ke liye Peer Review Feedback ka istemal kaise karein
Mujhe woh ehsaas achhe se maloom hai. Mahinein apni research paper mein dil lagane aur submit karne ke baad, peer review feedback kabhi-kabhi sakht ho sakta hai. Intezaar ke bechain dinon ke baad, aapka pyaara kaam kuch teekhi tipon ke saath wapas lautta hai. Unhe padhna ek dukh bhara anubhav ho sakta hai. Shetra mein naye researcher ke roop mein, yeh ek aam bhavna hai jo hum sab saanjha karte hain jab humare papers par teekhi reviewer alochnayein aati hain. Lekin apne aap par zyada kathin na ho - samay aur anubhav ke saath, aap is process ke aadhi ho jayenge. Vastav mein, yahan kuch sakaratmak nazariye hain jo shayad aapne in alochanaon se nipatte samay nahin soche honge.
Koi revision hamesha acchi khabar nahi hoti
Jab yeh lagta hai ki revision requests na milna ek sakaratmak sanket hai, yeh hamesha sach nahi hota. Sabhi high-quality journals mein ek sakht peer review prakriya hoti hai, jahan shetra ke expert reviewers aapke lekh ko initial editor screening ke baad detail mein evaluate karte hain. Aam taur par, kai experts ko aapke paper ko review karne aur editor ko feedback dene ke liye niyukt kiya jata hai, jo aapse sudhar ke sujhaav dete hain. Kuch pratisthit patrikaon mein, yeh reviewers aur lekhak ke beech ka len-den do ya teen baar tak bhi ho sakta hai.
Kisi submit ki gai paper ka itna suthra hona kaafi rare hai ki reviewers bina kisi revision ke aamantran ka sujhaav dete hain. Is baat ko dekhte hue, aapko revision ki avashyakta hone ka anuman lagana chahiye, chahe woh chhoti ho ya badi. Agar koi submit ki gai article vaise hi sweekar kar li jaye aur dheere samay ke antaral mein, toh patrika ki pratishtha ko dobiara check karna uchit hai, kyunki yeh shayad ek shikar patrika ho sakti hai.
2. Unhein yeh pasand hai, bas thode sudhar chahiye
Is baat ka yeh matlab hai ki aapka paper revision ki mang karta hai, yaani yeh pehle hi initial editor screening pass kar chuka hai, jahan aapki research ka format, scope, depth, aur novelty ko evaluate kiya gaya aur uchit paya gaya. Bache hue kadam expert reviewers se feedback lena hai jo paper ke vivaran ko detail mein jaanchenge.
Achi khabar yeh hai ki reviewers bhi aapke paper ko patrika mein prakashit hone ke yogya maante hain, kuch revisions ki avashyakta hone ke bawjood. In dono stithiyon mein, aapka kaam takkhanal reject nahi hua, jo ki low-quality prastav ke liye asaan faisla hota. Iska matlab aap aadi raste tak pahunche hain! Ab bas article ko thoda aur refine karna hai.
3. Aapko muft expert salllah milti hai
Peer review stage ke dauran, reviewers kisi bhi parinam ke liye vyakhya dena padta hai, chahe woh rejection ho ya minor/major revisions ki maang ho. Unhe paper ki kamzori ya kami ko pehchanna aur editor ko apni recommendation ke saath yeh feedback dena padta hai. Iska matlab hai ki aapko aapki research par muft, third-party expert salaah mil rahi hai! Parinam chahe jo bhi ho, aap reviewers ke comment ka upayog apni research aur writing ko sudharne ke liye kar sakte hain. Yeh prakriya dissertation likhne se pehle ek valuable training ground savit hoti hai.
4. Koi ginti nahi rakhta
Mere utpadak PhD varshon ke dauran, maine aur paper rejection dekhe hain in comparison to publications! Lekin isne meri PhD stithi ko ya university ki dharana mujh par prabhavit nahi ki. Yeh bhale hi nirasha janak ho, maine is anubhav se bahut kuch seekha hai. Paper rejection ya revision akadamia mein bahut aam baat hai, toh ise vyaktigat roop se na lein. Ek achha revision agle chakkar mein aapki paper ke sweekar hone ki sambhavna ko badha dega.
Ab jab aap peer review ka sakaratmak paksh dekh sakte hain, toh yahaan kuch jald suggestions hain ki kaise pratikriya dekar pratikriya karen:
Koment ko ek-ek karke padhne ka samay lena behtar hai, lekin turant usi din revision karna talna. Yeh woh samay ho sakta hai jab feedback sabse zyada chubhe, isiliye revision process shuru karne se pehle khud ko 'thik' hone ka samay de.
Koment ko asaan aur kathin mein shreni badh kar lein, phir pehle asaan walon ko address karen, jaise ki grammar ya vaakya sanrachna ghalatiyan. Yeh approach revision prakriya ko shuru karne mein madad kar sakta hai aur pragati aur inspiration ka ek ehsaas pradaan kar sakta hai. Iske alawa, Jenni.ai jaise AI editing tools ka upayog karke aap samay bacha sakte hain aur aapke sanshodhit manuscript ko majboot kar sakte hain.
Koment ka jawab dekar smartly pratikriya karen. Aksar logon ko yeh pata nahi hota, reviewers reviewing ke liye paise nahi lete, isliye humein aabhar vyakt karna chahiye ki unhone feedback dene ke liye apna samay nikala, reject karne ki sifarish karne ke bajaaye. Aap kuch komment se asahmat hote hain, lekin yeh reviewer ki galat samajh ho sakti hai. Vyaktigat vinamrata banayein aur sthir karen with strong reasoning.
Yadi avashyak nahin, phir bhi ek alag manuscript pradaan karen jismeen sansodhan ko ek viruddh rang, jaise yellow ya neela mein namanak kiya gaya ho. Changes ko highlight karne se reviewer ke liye unhein pehchanan aasan hota hai, jaisa ki unhein apni pichli pratikriya yaad na ho. Yeh reviewer ka samay bacha sakta hai, jo bina aur revision ke sweekar hone tak le ja sakta hai.
Aakhirkar, peer review ka maqsad aapki research paper ko sudharna hota hai, isiliye ise nakaratmak roop se nahi dekhna chahiye. Maine kabhi negatib comments wale paper ko practically revamp kiya tha aur revamping ke baad woh paper khoob sudhar gaya aur tab se mera sabse zyada cited journal article ban chuka hai, poori yaadgar un reviewers ke jo review karne aur feedback dene ke liye tayaar rahe. Isliye, peer review process ka dar mat rakhna - yeh aapke paper ko sudharne mein madad kar sakta hai!