Como funciona
De uma página em branco a um artigo com citações em três etapas
Importe suas fontes
Arraste PDFs, importe do Zotero ou Mendeley, ou deixe a Jenni pesquisar em mais de 200 milhões de artigos. Sua biblioteca fica pronta em segundos.
Escreva com o apoio da IA
O preenchimento automático inteligente com IA sugere frases baseadas em artigos científicos reais. As sugestões vêm com citações e podem ser rastreadas até a fonte original.
Citar, rever, exportar
Citações no texto com um clique em mais de 2.600 estilos. Verifique qualquer afirmação diretamente no PDF original. Exporte para .docx, LaTeX ou HTML.
Six ways your citations can fail — and how Jenni catches them
Claim Confidence verifies every cited claim against its source and sorts issues into six categories — so you know exactly what kind of fix is needed.
Misrepresented
The claim distorts what the cited source actually says.
EXAMPLE
"Smith (2022) demonstrated that GPT-4 outperforms human teachers" — when Smith only measured grading speed, not teaching quality.
Contradicted
The cited source argues the opposite of the claim.
EXAMPLE
"Continuous fasting accelerates cellular repair (Lin et al., 2023)" — but Lin's findings show repair plateaus after 72 hours.
Unsupported
The cited source doesn't address the claim at all.
EXAMPLE
"CRISPR-Cas9 has been ethically endorsed by the WHO (Doudna, 2020)" — Doudna discusses mechanism, not WHO policy.
Weakly supported
Evidence in the source is thin or limited in scope.
EXAMPLE
"Resistance training improves cognition across populations (Conan, 2020)" — Conan studied only collegiate athletes.
Overstated
The claim goes further than the source warrants.
EXAMPLE
"LLM tutors significantly improve student outcomes (Park, 2024)" — Park reports a small effect on one task.
Unverifiable
The cited source can't be located or accessed.
EXAMPLE
"(Nakamura et al., 2019)" — DOI doesn't resolve, and no record exists in any indexed database.
See Claim Confidence in action
Watch Jenni's AI citation checker verify a real draft, flag weak and unsupported claims, and surface the source passages — in just over a minute.
Não é apenas mais um chatbot de IA
Existem centenas de ferramentas de IA. Veja o que diferencia a Jenni do ChatGPT:
Reads the full source
Other AI citation checkers verify metadata — does the paper exist, is the DOI valid, is the author real. Claim Confidence reads the full text of every cited source, so verdicts come from what the paper actually says.
Six verdicts, not pass/fail
A binary "verified" stamp doesn't tell you how to fix a problem. Six categories pinpoint exactly what kind of edit each claim needs.
Suggested rewrites grounded in the source
When a claim falls short, Claim Confidence surfaces the actual passage from the cited source and proposes a rewrite that fits what the source supports.
Identifique falhas antes dos revisores
O Reviews analisa cada afirmação do seu artigo, cruza com suas fontes e sinaliza problemas em seis categorias. Envie seu trabalho com confiança, não com ansiedade.
Afirmações não verificadas ou especulativas são uma das principais causas de rejeição em revisão por pares. A Jenni identifica isso em segundos.
Peer review8 / 10
Manuscript scored against a peer-review rubric with reviewer comments on each section.
Soundness
3/4
Presentation
4/4
Contribution
3/4
Results
Strengths
Weaknesses
Claim confidence7 issues
Every cited claim verified against its source — sorted into seven verdicts so you know exactly what kind of fix each one needs.
Supported
23Misrepresented
Contradicted
1Unsupported
3Weakly supported
2Overstated
Unverifiable
1Proofread18 edits
Whilst generally sound, the text contains some areas for improvement to comply with academic best practices.
Word choice
AllThe majority of participants reported improved outcomes.
Formality
Yang (2024) found a negative correlation which was interesting..
Grammar
These results indicate that early intervention be effective. appears to be effective.
Transitions
Also, In addition, Jones (2022) found similar results.
Overgeneralized
AllThe majority of participants reported improved outcomes.
The results provesuggest that X has an effect on Y.Tone of voice22 notes
Suggestions across vocabulary, syntax, punctuation, tone and flow to keep a consistent academic voice.
All Suggestions
22Vocabulary
6Syntax
5Punctuation
4Tone
3Flow
4Análise de citações
Revisão acadêmica
Feedback direto no texto
Feedback direto no texto
Perguntas frequentes
Nossos usuários já publicaram em mais de 100 periódicos
Pesquisas reais, publicadas em revistas como IEEE, Springer e Elsevier — planejadas e escritas com a Jenni.
