Dwara
Nathan Auyeung
—
Peer Review Comments Ka Jawab Kaise Dein: Researchers Ke Liye Examples, Template, Aur Tips
Nathan Auyeung
Senior Accountant EY mein
Bachelor ka Accounting mein Graduation kiya, aur ek Postgraduate Diploma of Accounting bhi poora kiya
Ek revise aur resubmit decision milna achhi khabar hai. Iska matlab hai ki journal aapka paper chahta hai. Lekin 47 reviewer comments ka jawab dene ke liye baithna ek alag tarah ki chunauti hai. Jawab ka letter (response letter) zyada-tar researchers khud hi samajhte hain, jo ki exactly wahi wajah hai jisse bohot se log ise galat karte hain.
Yeh guide aapko step by step sikhata hai ki peer review comments ka jawab kaise dein: aapke replies ko phrase karne ke aasan tareeqe, ek template jise aap turant use kar sakte hain, aur un cases ko handle karne ka tareeqa jahan aap reviewer se sehmat nahi hain.
<CTA title="Fix the Issues Before You Resubmit" description="Apne revised manuscript ko majboot banane ke liye Jenni ka use karein. Apne claims ko verify karein, citation gaps ko fill karein, aur send karne se pehle polish karein." buttonLabel="Jenni Free Try Karein" link="https://app.jenni.ai/register" />
Editors Aapke Response Mein Asal Mein Kya Dekhte Hain
Editors response letter ko is saboot ke roop mein padhte hain ki aapne review ko kitni gambhirta se liya hai. Yeh koi formality nahi hai. Editors ise revised manuscript ke sath padhte hain taaki assess kar sakein ki uthaye gaye concerns ko thoroughly address kiya gaya hai ya sirf acknowledge kiya gaya hai. Teen cheezein sabse zyada matter karti hain:
Completeness: Har ek comment ka jawab dena, chahe aapka jawab "humein aadar ke sath asahmati hai" hi kyun na ho.
Clarity: Yeh trace karna aasan ho ki manuscript mein har change exactly kahan kiya gaya hai.
Professionalism: Koi defensiveness nahi, koi dismissiveness nahi, aur baato ko gol-gol ghumana nahi.
Ek response letter jo ek bhi comment ko chhod deta hai, chahe voh kitna bhi minor ho, editor ko yeh signal deta hai ki revision thorough nahi tha. Completeness non-negotiable hai. Peer review ke types ko samajhna jo aapka journal use karta hai, aapko guide kar sakta hai ki aapka response kitna formal hona chahiye. Open review processes ke liye, example ke liye, aur zyada detailed explanations ki zaroorat ho sakti hai kyunki aapka response public record ka hissa ban sakta hai.
Apne Response Letter Ko Kaise Structure Karein
The Opening Paragraph (Shuruati Paragraph)
Ek brief professional acknowledgement se shuru karein. Ek ya do sentences kaafi hain. Ise sincere aur specific rakhein, formulaic nahi. Aise openers se bachein jo kisi bhi manuscript par apply ho sakein. Reviewers ke constructive engagement ka reference dein jahan zaroorat ho.
"Hum editor aur dono reviewers ko unke thorough aur constructive feedback ke liye dhanyawad dena chahte hain. Humne niche har comment ko dhyan se address kiya hai aur humein vishwas hai ki iske result ke roop mein manuscript kaafi majboot ho gaya hai."
Comment-Response Format
Apna response likhne se pehle har ek reviewer comment ko verbatim (exact words mein) quote karein. Kabhi bhi paraphrase na karein. Paraphrasing se is baat par ambiguity aati hai ki aap kis baat ka response de rahe hain, aur editors is difference ko notice karte hain.
Format simple hai: pehle quote karein, phir directly niche respond karein.
Reviewer 1, Comment 3: "The discussion section overstates the generalizability of the findings given the sample size."
Response: "Hum is concern se sahmat hain. Humne Discussion ke final paragraph (page 14, lines 312-318) ko revise kiya hai taaki humare generalizability claims ko studied population tak hi limit kiya ja sake. Humne ek limitations subsection bhi add kiya hai jo ise directly address karta hai."
<ProTip title="📌 Reminder:" description="Apne response se pehle hamesha reviewer comment ko verbatim quote karein. Ise kabhi paraphrase na karein. Paraphrasing se ambiguity create hoti hai ki aap kis baat ka response de rahe hain." />
Respectfully Disagree Kaise Karein
Disagree karna completely acceptable hai. Ise ek colleague ke samne counter-argument present karne ki tarah sochein, khud ka bachav karne ki tarah nahi. Specific rahein, professional bane rahein, aur editor ko un evidences ki taraf point karein jo aapki position ko support karte hain.
"Hum statistical model ke choice ke regarding reviewer ke concern ki saraahana karte hain. Halanki, hum aadar ke sath apne original approach par bane hue hain kyunki [specific reason]. Humne page 8 par ek footnote add kiya hai jo is methodological decision ko aur detail mein explain karta hai."
Research confirm karti hai ki respectful disagreement peer review process ka ek normal part hai. Editors jo dekhna chahte hain voh yeh ke aapne concern ko seriously liya hai, chahe aap conclusion ko accept na karein. Ek achhi tarah argued pushback forced concession se kahin zyada credible hota hai.
Peer Review Comments Ka Jawab Kaise Dein, Step by Step
In steps ko sequence mein follow karein. Sab kuch padhne se pehle hi responses likhna shuru kar dena revision letters mein sabse common mistake hai.
Step 1 — Kuch Bhi Respond Karne Se Pehle Sab Kuch Padhein
Ek bhi word likhne se pehle saare reviewer comments ko shuru se aakhir tak padhein. Kabhi-kabhi Reviewer 2 ka comment yeh explain karta hai ki Reviewer 1 ka comment contradictory kyun lag raha tha. Poori picture pehle dekhne se aap aise changes karne se bach jate hain jo aapas mein conflict karein. Yeh aapko patterns spot karne mein bhi help karta hai: agar do reviewers ne ek hi clarification manga hai to iska matlab hai ki ise detail mein address karne ki zaroorat hai.
Step 2 — Har Comment Ko Categorize Karein
Likhne se pehle, har comment ko teen categories mein se ek mein sort karein. Yeh aapko changes karne se pehle revision scope ka clear idea deta hai.
Easy fix: Factual corrections, typos, minor clarifications jise aap jaldi address kar sakte hain.
Major revision: New analysis, restructuring, ya additional data ke requests jo bade kaam ki maang karte hain.
Disagreement: Aise cases jahan aapko lagta hai ki reviewer factually galat hai ya request paper ke scope se bahar hai.
Step 3 — Apna Response Table Banayein
Formal letter likhne se pehle, Google Doc ya Word file mein ek tracking table banayein. Columns: Reviewer number, Comment number, Summary of comment, Your planned response, Manuscript location of change. Yeh aapka master document ban jata hai aur ensure karta hai ki kuch bhi choote nahi.
<ProTip title="💡 Pro Tip:" description="Formal letter likhne se pehle Google Doc ya Word file mein ek table banayein. Yeh aapka master tracking document ban jata hai aur isse kisi comment ka miss hona lagbhag impossible ho jata hai." />
Step 4 — Precise Manuscript References Ke Sath Apne Responses Likhein
Har response ko editor ko exactly us jagah point karna chahiye jahan change kiya gaya tha. Vague responses jaise "humne manuscript ko accordingly revise kar diya hai" reviewers ko frustrate karte hain aur editors ko convince nahi kar paate. Hamesha specific page aur line numbers ka use karein.
"Humne is concern ko address karne ke liye page X, lines Y-Z par [section] ko revise kiya hai."
"Humne Discussion (page 12) mein ek naya paragraph add kiya hai jo explain karta hai..."
"Requested error bars ko include karne ke liye figure ko update kiya gaya hai (ab Figure 3 hai)."
<ProTip title="📝 Note:" description="Agar reviewer aisi cheez maangta hai jo aap nahi kar sakte, to clearly wajah batayein aur ek alternative offer karein. Shant rehte hue bina bole rehne se achha hai ki ek well-reasoned response diya jaye ki aapne iski jagah kya kiya hai." />
Step 5 — Manuscript Mein Track Changes Enable Karein
Apna revised manuscript track changes ke sath submit karein taaki reviewers aur editors easily dekh sakein ki kahan aur kya badla gaya hai. Iske sath ek clean copy bina track changes ke bhi include karein. Pehle journal ki submission guidelines check karein, kyunki kuch journals sirf clean copies hi mangte hain.
Response to Reviewers Template
Ise copy karein aur apne base file ke roop mein save karein. Har us revision ke liye ise fill karein jise aap submit karte hain. Yeh structure sabhi journals aur disciplines mein kaam karta hai, isliye aapko kabhi bhi scratch se shuru nahi karna padega.
<ProTip title="💡 Pro Tip:" description="Is template ko ek base file ke roop mein save karein aur har us revision ke liye fill karein jise aap submit karte hain. Yeh structure saare journals mein consistent rehta hai, isliye aapko phir kabhi blank page se shuru nahi karna padega." />
Apna Response Letter Draft Karne Ke Liye Jenni Ka Use Kaise Karein
Jenni aapko manuscript revisions par kaam karne mein help kar sakti hai taaki aapke responses ek stronger aur more rigorous draft par grounded hon. Pehle substance se shuru karein, phir language ko sharpen karein — manuscript edits ke structured walkthrough ke liye humari how to revise a research paper guide dekhein.
Step 1: Jenni mein apna revised manuscript open karein Apne revised manuscript ko Jenni document library mein upload karein. Ise apne original version ke sath rakhein agar aap response process ke dauran badlavo ko directly compare karna chahte hain.
Step 2: Verify karein ki aapke revised claims properly supported hain ya nahi
Apne responses likhne se pehle, verify karein ki jo changes aapne kiye hain voh sahi hain. Apna selected document ke sath AI Chat open karein aur is prompt ko run karein:
"Check whether the claims in my revised Discussion section are all supported by cited sources"
Step 4: Submit karne se pehle ek aakhri baar Jenni Reviews run karein Revised manuscript ko wapas bhejne se pehle, Jenni Reviews feature ke zariye ek aakhri pass run karein. Editing se naye issues uth sakte hain, aur thorough revision ke baad aap nahi chahenge ki koi naya unsupported claim miss ho jaye.
Frequently Asked Questions (Aksar Pooche Jane Wale Sawal)
Reviewers ko diya jaane wala response kitna lamba hona chahiye?
Reviewers ko diya jaane wala response utna lamba hona chahiye jitna har comment ko thoroughly address karne ke liye zaroorat ho. Zyada-tar responses comments ki sankhya ke aadhar par do se che (6) pages ke beech hote hain. Iski koi maximum limit nahi hai. Jo cheez matter karti hai voh yeh hai ki har reviewer comment ko clearly address kiya jaye, aur kahan changes kiye gaye hain uske specific manuscript references diye jayein.
Agar main kisi reviewer se asahmat hoon to kya hoga?
Reviewer se asahmat hona completely acceptable hai aur kabhi-kabhi zaroori bhi hota hai. Comment ko verbatim quote karein, apni reasoning ko clearly explain karein, aur editor ko un evidences ki taraf point karein jo aapki position ko support karte hain. Kisi concern ko bina uspar kaam kiye kabhi dismiss na karein. Ek well-argued disagreement editor ke liye forced concession se kahin zyada credible hota hai.
Kya mujhe reviewer ke bataye har change ko karna zaroori hai?
Nahi. Aap har suggestion ko accept karne ke liye bound nahi hain, lekin aapko har comment ko address zaroor karna hoga. Jin changes ke liye aap mana karte hain, unka reason clearly explain karein aur jahan possible ho ek alternative offer karein. Editors samajhte hain ki reviewers kabhi-kabhi aisi cheezein mangte hain jo paper ke scope ke bahar hoti hain. Ek clear aur professional explanation hamesha sufficient hota hai.
Revise and resubmit ka kya matlab hota hai?
Revise and resubmit ka matlab hai ki journal aapke paper mein interested hai lekin use accept karne se pehle badlavo ki zaroorat hai. Yeh rejection nahi hai. Editor chahta hai ki aap reviewer comments ko address karein aur ek detailed response letter ke sath revised manuscript send karein, jismein aapke kiye gaye har ek change ka explanation ho.
Kya resubmit karte waqt mujhe track changes ka use karna chahiye?
Haan, zyada-tar cases mein. Apna revised manuscript track changes enabled ke sath submit karein taaki editor aur reviewers dekh sakein ki exactly kya badla gaya tha aur kahan badla gaya tha. Iske sath bina track changes ke ek clean copy bhi include karein. Pehle journal ki submission guidelines check karein, kyunki kuch journals sirf clean copies hi mangte hain.
Aapka Response Letter Paper Ka Hi Part Hai
Ek strong response sirf ek formality nahi hai. Yeh aapke paper ke accept hone ke process ka hissa hai. Editors ise dhyan se padhte hain. Ise usi rigor (gambhirta) ke sath treat karein jo aapne manuscript par apply ki thi: specific rahein, professional bane rahein, aur reviewers ko ek clear path dein taaki voh dekh sakein ki aapne unke feedback ko seriously liya hai.
<CTA title="Resubmit Karne Se Pehle Apne Revision Ko Aur Strong Banayein" description="Apne revised claims ko verify karne, citation gaps ko fill karne, aur round two ke liye manuscript ready hai ya nahi yeh check karne ke liye Jenni ka use karein." buttonLabel="Jenni Free Try Karein" link="https://app.jenni.ai/register" />
Ek baar jab aapka response submit ho jaye aur paper final check ke liye wapas aaye, to Jenni ka use karke apne manuscript ka ek aakhri review run karein. Agar aap khud response likhne ke bajaye ek review report likhne ki taiyari kar rahe hain, to humari guide how to write a peer review report se shuru karein. Revision process ko navigate karne ke liye aur guidance pane ke liye, humari peer review feedback tips dekhein.