從端到端，從源頭到提交
真實的研究，真實的成果
發表於 IEEE、Springer 和 100 多個同行
{
在設計上具備 defense 能力
學術寫作不僅僅是起草，更是一種防禦。Jenni 協助您建立論點，使其能夠承受最挑剔讀者的審視。
站得住腳的論點
提出反駁據點、補強薄弱論述，並對您的論證進行壓力測試。這是一款能深度強化您的草稿，而非僅僅流於修飾的人工智慧。
長篇連貫性
在每個章節和每次修改中，保持語氣、術語和引用風格的一致性。從大綱到最終手稿皆然。
母語級學術英語
符合 30 多種語言的正式學術、簡明科學或技術語調。對多語言研究人員尤其有幫助。
提交前審查
在審查人員發現之前就先找出問題
在審稿人發現問題之前，有四個審查層級可以捕捉問題：同儕審查、聲稱信心、校對和語調。同時運行它們以獲得站得住腳的初稿。
Peer review8 / 10
Manuscript scored against a peer-review rubric with reviewer comments on each section.
Soundness
3/4
Presentation
4/4
Contribution
3/4
Results
Strengths
Weaknesses
Claim confidence7 issues
Every cited claim verified against its source — sorted into seven verdicts so you know exactly what kind of fix each one needs.
Supported
23Misrepresented
Contradicted
1Unsupported
3Weakly supported
2Overstated
Unverifiable
1Proofread18 edits
Whilst generally sound, the text contains some areas for improvement to comply with academic best practices.
Word choice
AllThe majority of participants reported improved outcomes.
Formality
Yang (2024) found a negative correlation which was interesting..
Grammar
These results indicate that early intervention be effective. appears to be effective.
Transitions
Also, In addition, Jones (2022) found similar results.
Overgeneralized
AllThe majority of participants reported improved outcomes.
The results provesuggest that X has an effect on Y.Tone of voice22 notes
Suggestions across vocabulary, syntax, punctuation, tone and flow to keep a consistent academic voice.
All Suggestions
22Vocabulary
6Syntax
5Punctuation
4Tone
3Flow
4同儕審查
理賠信心
校對
語氣
